Is it Doud, Doude, or Dowd?

		Duane Leet - Nov 6, 2009   View | Edit | Delete | Viewers Categories: B1,66,Andrew Leete     Vi, I got your letter about the Doud name.   I'm in full agreement with you about validating every entry I can with a primary document.   At the same time, I am documenting all the errors, so that future generations will understand that these are errors and not just valid alternatives.   My current tree has Henry Doude but there is some conflict on the last name of his children:   Currently, the consensus internet has as his children: - Rebecca Doude - Mary Dowd - Thomas Doud - John Doude - Jacob Doud - Sarah Doud - Jeremiah Doud - Elizabeth Doude - Rachael Doude So there's "every spelling in the book."   I assume the book you referred to in your note is : "All the Descendants of Henry Doude...etc".   What I assume would be a primary source, the Barbour Collection, lists Elizabeth, for example, under the heading Dowd, Doud, Doude.   So that's no help.   I did find one marriage record that makes sense.   Does this make sense to you, and do I use the "preferred" name as Doud for all his children?   Have you seen a will or other record where Henry lists his children by last name (other than married name)?   Thanks, Duane ______________________ The US and International Marriage Records 1560-1900 Database:   Name: Mary Doud Gender: female Spouse Name: Samuel Hughes Marriage Year: 1666 Number Pages: 1 Source Citation: Source number: 508.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: JWV. Source Information: Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: The Generations Network, Inc., 2004. Original data: This unique collection of records was extracted from a variety of sources including family group sheets and electronic databases. Originally, the information was derived from an array of materials including pedigree charts, family history articles, querie. Description: This database contains marriage record information for approximately 1,400,000 individuals from across all 50 United States and 32 different countries around the world between 1560 and 1900. These records, which include information on over 500 years of marriages, were extracted from family group sheets, electronic databases, biographies, wills, and other sources. Learn more...
		Read what others had to say:
		Vi James - Nov 9, 2009   Edit | Delete | Viewers | Reply to this item     Hi Duane:   The book that I am referring to is:   when Andrew and Submit were married, was for all the marriages at the church where all the marriages were recorded, I can't remember if I sent you a full page of the marriages or not, but I will send you another one.   So we know the record was recorded in Oct, 1773.   The book, that the page was taken from, you can see is all tattered down the side,   Then in another book, that I have a copy off. it is all nicely rewritten in lovely hand writing, and they took the liberty of spelling her name "Dowd."     I have a land deed with her father's name on it and they spell his name Janna Doude.   This is in 1741/2 were Samuel Leete is selling land to Janna Doude.   You will see they both were written with the "e." I consider a "Primary Document" a hand written legal paper that is recorded in, and kept by the Court House, in the County they were living in at that time period.   That is why I feel that the County name is a must in genealogy.   You go to the County Seat and take down the big books and make copies.   What LDS did was go into all the Court Houses and make copies, and then went back to Salt Lake City and developed the films, and I can order them, and look at the actual records that is in that County and no one else has changed them.   They are exactly as they were written on that date.   When I first started doing genealogy in 1950, an elderly gentlemen told us that you are not doing genealogy until you do the old Land Records, this is the reason that I take all land records for most of my information.   No one changes them.   You may find a dozen different ways that other people, who have sent in records, and they will all vary from one record to another.   What is in the Court House you do not change.   IGI is good, if it is extracted information, but if it is submitted information, do not not trust it.   Meaning if it is submitted information, it is genealogy that is sent to SLC,   this is genealogy done by well meaning people, and they have sent it to SLC to be recorded.   Here is where a lot of the false information comes from.   People pick it up, and think that the person who did it knows what they are talking about.   So these data bases contain a lot of rotten genealogy.   Don't trust them.   What I sent you before, will have the source written on the back of the page.   Also a Film Number and a Vol. Number so that someone else can check out the same record at the Court House. I will tell you that when I started to do #66. I decided to start at William Leete and I went through every film for Guilford, and have every land deed, up to about 1840, I think.     I have not looked at them for a long time.   The above named Source Information, you list, is all full of errors as they were taking what they could of anyones information, and they are full of errors.   Don't trust their information.   All for now.   Vi James
		Vi James - Nov 9, 2009   Edit | Delete | Viewers | Reply to this item     I see that I did not answer the 2nd part of your question.   When they came   in 1639, they had Doude on the list of people.   Like the Leetes, somewhere along the line the "e" started to be dropped, so also the Doude name, somewhere along the line the "e" started to be dropped.   I would stick with Doude/Doud.   Dowd was late in arriving for this spelling.   This shows that both spelling was used for this name.     What ever is on the Document at the time that it was written is the way I spell it.   So when I am writing, you will see me switch back and forth in the same letter when I am relating to a certain record that I am referring to.   I am spelling it as the document spells it.   When looking at the Source Information that you refer to:   look at what it refers to as their sources.   Family Group Sheets, etc.,etc.   I would not touch these with a 10' pole, pedigree charts, family history, queire, some may be good, but most have not done extensive research and their info gets in the pipe line and create more errors. Oh horrors. When Submit was married you will see on the hand written document, it is spelled Doud, and on the Divorce you will see it is Doud.   These had to be records that were in the Court House, and I consider them "Primary Documents."     On the back of them, you will see the LDS Film No. 1672069   Item #2.   This whole film was for the Divorces in New Haven Co. Connecticut and there was a lot of divorces, it was not rare.   Vi James
		Duane Leet - Nov 9, 2009   Edit | Delete | Viewers | Reply to this item     Vi, I'm going to transfer this entire dialog to the new Blog I've created.   A blog is like the forums of old.   However, the Blogs I use permits embedding pictures, text, movies, etc. in line with the text, which will help me ask questions and illustrate the questions as well.   You've got a wealth of research knowledge, and I want to make the Blog the place where we describe the techniques we use and argue WHY we made decisions about selecting this information over that information. You'll find the blog works about the same way this post and reply session works.   Click comment at the bottom to comment on a blog item.   The blog url is http://leeteleetblog.blogspot.com/.   Thanks, Duane